In reply to:
Peter Lombard
@tutticontenti
·
70d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
71d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a debate about a public figure (Biden) and his policies, specifically in the context of a political discussion. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, and the intent appears to be to challenge the other participant's commitment to a cause.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is confrontational and accusatory, which can escalate tensions and harm the discourse. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others; it engages in a personal attack by questioning 'What the hell is wrong with YOU?' (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to a personal attack rather than addressing the issue at hand. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.