In reply to:
KushThru BLM Movement Forever
@KushthruBlm
·
67d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
67d
The statement 'Even' by @KushthruBlm in response to a conversation about political stakes and corporate capture of the Supreme Court does not constitute public discourse. It is a brief, ambiguous reply that lacks substantive engagement with the public issues being discussed.
- The statement does not cause harm but also does not contribute meaningfully.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not use influence for societal betterment.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement does not uphold or violate free speech principles.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.