Marianne Williamson

The statement by @tify330 and the subsequent reply by @MsMalarkey24 and the final response by the individual claiming to have earned half a million votes in the primaries constitute public discourse. The conversation revolves around the political process, campaign legitimacy, and the right to participate in a convention, which are substantive public issues.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement by the individual claiming to have earned half a million votes does not appear to cause harm. It defends their campaign's legitimacy and right to participate in the convention. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, although it does respond to perceived shaming and misunderstanding. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the individual's perspective on their campaign's legitimacy and the process. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the misunderstanding and defending the campaign's right to participate. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]