In reply to:
Glenn Little
@GlennLittle5
·
67d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
67d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about corporate interests, immigration policies, and their societal impacts. The tone is assertive and challenges the previous statement by asking for evidence while acknowledging a related issue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a direct response to a previous comment and does not use harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does acknowledge a related issue (exploitation of immigrants).Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by challenging the previous comment and asking for evidence. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to the public discourse on immigration and corporate interests. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.