Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 90
7/21/2024, 5:51:44 PM
X
In reply to:
Ethan Mollick
@emollick
·
467d
I suspect a lack of emblematic events is making a lot of people miss the capability growth of AI. Kasparov versus Deep Blue was everywhere in culture, and people still reference it. I wonder what similar events in other fields might look like.

The statement engages in a discussion about the growth and impact of AI, referencing a historical event (Kasparov vs. Deep Blue) and comparing it to the development of GPT-4. The tone is somewhat critical, suggesting that the growth since GPT-4 has not been as impactful or 'iconic.'

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is a part of a constructive dialogue about AI development. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a discussion about the significance of AI milestones. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the perceived lack of impactful events in AI development. [+1]