The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the actions of political figures and suggesting a course of action for another. The tone is somewhat directive and implies a comparison between two political figures, which can be polarizing.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as polarizing, which might indirectly contribute to divisiveness. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a strong suggestion about a public figure's actions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more directive and comparative. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a directive suggestion without providing a rationale or engaging in discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does not necessarily use the platform to promote a balanced or constructive dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.