In reply to:
The statement by Trump constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically policies related to the border and the performance of a public official.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is critical of policies and a public official's performance. It does not appear to incite violence or harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement criticizes a public official's performance but does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. However, calling someone 'the worst ever' could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical and dismissive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive feedback or engage in dialogue. It includes a personal attack by calling the official 'the worst ever.' [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to the personal attack. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.