In reply to:
Robert Costa
@costareports
·
70d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the legitimacy of a political figure and the role of the media. The tone is accusatory and dismissive, suggesting that the current political leader is unfit for office and that the media is complicit in this situation.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it implies that the current political leader is illegitimate and criticizes the media without evidence, which can be harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the political leader or the media, and it borders on harassment by making unsubstantiated claims. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is divisive and accusatory. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes personal attacks and uses ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it spreads potentially harmful and unverified information. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.