Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
348d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of AI development, specifically addressing the debate around the capabilities and methodologies of AI in solving complex problems. The tone is critical and somewhat confrontational, aiming to praise one approach while criticizing another.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a metaphor that could be seen as dismissive towards certain AI researchers.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize specific individuals in a public forum.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on taking sides in a debate. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a way that could be seen as a personal attack on Hinton and LeCun, rather than focusing solely on their ideas. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to support a particular approach in AI, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by promoting innovation. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to engage in a public debate, but the tone could be more respectful and constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.