The statement 'If you are asking that question you are missing the point. LLMs ≠ AlphaProof.' is part of a substantive engagement with public issues related to artificial general intelligence (AGI) and the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The tone is somewhat dismissive, suggesting that the question posed by @Lang__Leon is not relevant or misses the core issue. The intent appears to be to clarify a distinction between LLMs and a neurosymbolic approach like AlphaProof.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the dismissive tone could be seen as unconstructive.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on correcting a perceived misunderstanding.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it dismisses the question without providing a detailed explanation.
[-1]