In reply to:
Strange loop
@neuro_vtr
·
348d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
348d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
348d
The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about AI methodologies, specifically the use of neurosymbolic approaches versus traditional symbolic AI (GOFAI). The conversation addresses public concerns and debates within the AI research community, making it relevant to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a technical clarification rather than a harmful remark. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by clarifying a technical distinction. However, it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by clarifying a misunderstanding about AI methodologies. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to clarify a technical point. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.