Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement questions the competitive landscape among AI companies focusing on building foundational models and expresses skepticism about the value of this competition. The tone is inquisitive and somewhat critical, aiming to provoke thought about the motivations behind these companies' actions.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a critical observation rather than an attack. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the rationale behind the competition, potentially fostering a deeper discussion about the goals and impacts of AI development. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the industry's focus without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By questioning the motivations behind AI development, the statement uses influence to potentially steer the conversation towards more meaningful and beneficial advancements in AI. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to raise a valid concern about the direction of AI development. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.