Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
443d
What a strange world…

All the major AI companies spending billions producing almost exactly the same results using almost exactly the same data using almost exactly the same technology, all flawed in almost exactly the same ways.

Historians gonna be scratching their heads.
7/25/2024, 11:28:46 PM
X
In reply to:
Sebastian Thrun
@SebastianThrun
·
347d
I really wonder why so many AI companies seem to blindly compete for building the same thing: the best foundational models, as measured by some abstract set of benchmarks. It feels like there is now an entire ecosystems of companies that want to outperform GPT.x. Why?

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the current state of AI development and competition among AI companies. The tone is reflective and critical, aiming to contribute to the ongoing debate about the direction and focus of AI research and development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is a neutral reflection on the state of AI development, thus adhering to the principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by aligning with a previously made point, contributing to a broader conversation about AI development. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, adhering to the principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]