In reply to:
Sabine Hossenfelder
@skdh
·
346d
The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue: the impact of AI-generated content on web search and the potential collapse of AI models. The tone is cautionary and aims to highlight a critical concern in the field of AI and web search.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a cautionary note about a potential issue, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by sharing a link to a detailed analysis of the issue. It aims to inform and educate the public about a significant concern. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by referencing a previous discussion and providing additional information. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the influence of the author to raise awareness about a societal issue, which can be seen as an effort to better society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by sharing a well-reasoned concern about AI and web search integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.