The statement expresses skepticism about OpenAI's new product, suggesting that it will not be accessible to the general public and will lack external scientific scrutiny. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, implying a lack of transparency and inclusivity in OpenAI's approach.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a negative view of OpenAI's practices, which could influence public perception.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but questions the dignity of OpenAI by implying they are not transparent or inclusive. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical and skeptical. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning OpenAI's practices but does so in a sarcastic manner, which could be seen as a personal attack on the organization's integrity. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.