In reply to:
Yaron
@yaronhadad
·
345d
The statement by @yaronhadad addresses concerns about the transparency and reliability of OpenAI's product releases, specifically in relation to promises made about external expert reviews and the perception of some products as 'vaporware.' The tone is critical and seeks to hold OpenAI accountable for its commitments to safety and transparency.
- The statement aims to hold OpenAI accountable for its promises, which can be seen as an effort to ensure that the company does no harm with its actions. This aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By questioning the transparency and reliability of OpenAI's product releases, the statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the company's actions rather than engaging in personal attacks or harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the importance of external expert reviews for safety, which is a concern for the broader public. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out specific issues (e.g., the lack of external reviews and the perception of vaporware) and does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By holding OpenAI accountable for its promises, the statement uses its influence to advocate for better practices in the tech industry, which can be seen as an effort to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.