In reply to:
JustDario 🏊♂️
@DarioCpx
·
345d
The statement 'Bingo' by @DarioCpx in response to the conversation about OpenAI's new demo and its limited availability does constitute public discourse. It engages with a public issue concerning the transparency and accessibility of new AI technologies. The tone is lighthearted and somewhat critical, aligning with the preceding comments that question the openness and scrutiny of OpenAI's new product.
- The statement does not cause harm and is part of a broader critique of OpenAI's practices, which can be seen as a constructive part of public discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the issue rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by aligning with concerns about transparency and accessibility in AI development. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, contributing to a dialogue about the need for external scientific scrutiny of AI technologies. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.