Gary Marcus

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a debate about sexism, political behavior, and double standards in public conduct. The tone is defensive and aims to highlight perceived inconsistencies in how different political figures are criticized.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as contributing to a contentious debate.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does involve a public figure and thus touches on issues of privacy and dignity.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement attempts to promote understanding by pointing out a perceived double standard, but it does so in a confrontational manner.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in dialogue and criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]