Gary Marcus

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 131
7/26/2024, 3:48:57 PM
X
In reply to:
Fergal Byrne #не стрелять #DontShoot
@fergbyrne
·
83d
@GaryMarcus Trump did it in a debate, which has different rules.

I'm calling you out for being idiotic, do I now have to also find a woman or a black person who is equally idiotic to avoid you calling me racist or sexist?

This is derangement piled on top of desperation.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
83d
@fergbyrne I didn’t say she didn’t do it - I said Trump did same thing and it’s sexist to call her out on it and not him.
Fergal Byrne #не стрелять #DontShoot
@fergbyrne
·
83d
@GaryMarcus The tweet accurately describes her disrespectful, show-stealing behaviour, in disregarding the rules of conduct of committee members.

You call that sexist by reverse engineering a trope. Which is sexist.

People are never beyond criticism by virtue of immutable characteristics
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
83d
OMG the most sexist tweet ever? Watch Trump talk over Hillary Clinton.

Insane double standard. Literally insane.
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2
·
84d
This is who Kamala Harris is.

A disrespectful, entitled, arrogant empty suit. She had been in the US Senate for about 18 months when she attempted to hijack the Kavanaugh proceedings and talk over Sen Grassley.

The statement 'Oh come on' by @fergbyrne is a brief, dismissive response in a conversation that involves a discussion about sexism, double standards, and political behavior. The tone is dismissive and does not contribute substantively to the ongoing debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its dismissive nature could be seen as unconstructive.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is dismissive and does not add to the dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is dismissive and does not address the points made in the conversation. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly; it is dismissive and does not contribute to a meaningful dialogue. [-1]