In reply to:
Eric Daimler
@ead
·
339d
Sebastian Thrun
@SebastianThrun
·
340d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the strategies and dynamics within the AI and venture capital sectors, particularly focusing on the trend of companies competing to build foundational models and the impact on VC returns. This qualifies as public discourse as it addresses significant issues within the tech industry.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a professional critique of industry trends. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a discussion about industry practices and their implications. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss industry issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.