In reply to:
guyhealy
@guyhealy1
·
339d
The statement by @guyhealy1 asking @GaryMarcus and @baldurbjarnason to source their information properly to maintain credibility constitutes public discourse. It engages with the topic of AI's impact on productivity and the importance of credible sourcing in public discussions.
- The statement strives to do no harm and is neutral in tone, focusing on the importance of credibility. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By emphasizing the need for proper sourcing, the statement promotes understanding and credibility, which are essential for informed public discourse. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the need for proper sourcing without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to promote betterment in public discourse by advocating for credible and well-sourced information. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.