In reply to:
davidad 🎇
@davidad
·
339d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the future of AI, specifically the role of neurosymbolic systems in advancing beyond the limitations of pure deep learning. The tone is constructive and aims to clarify the author's long-standing position on the matter, contributing to the ongoing debate about AI methodologies.
- The statement strives to do no harm and is focused on clarifying a technical point rather than attacking individuals. It adheres to this principle well. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the author's position and contributing to the discourse on AI methodologies. It adheres to this principle well. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue, addressing a point of confusion without resorting to personal attacks. It adheres to this principle well. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.