The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in public discourse by discussing the effectiveness and transparency of a government initiative. The tone is critical, and the intent is to highlight perceived failures and misinformation related to the Biden-Harris administration's efforts to expand internet infrastructure.
- The statement and conversation aim to hold public figures accountable, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by promoting transparency. However, the accusatory tone may contribute to polarization.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of individuals but questions their professional actions, which is a legitimate part of public discourse. However, it could be seen as bordering on personal attacks. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It focuses on criticism without offering constructive solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not foster constructive dialogue. It could be seen as a personal attack on the administration's leaders rather than a critique of the policy itself. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.