In reply to:
Seamus Blackley
@SeamusBlackley
·
464d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
465d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the effectiveness and measurement of productivity tools, particularly generative AI, in the workplace. It critiques the current metrics used to evaluate these tools and suggests the need for new measures of productivity. The tone is critical and analytical, aiming to contribute to the ongoing debate about the impact of AI on productivity.
- The statement strives to do no harm and instead focuses on the need for better evaluation metrics, which is a constructive approach. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the discrepancy between the expected and actual productivity gains from AI tools, fostering a more informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the shortcomings of current productivity measures without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for better productivity measures, which can lead to more effective use of AI tools and ultimately benefit society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.