In reply to:
Eric Siegel
@predictanalytic
·
462d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue, namely the debate around artificial general intelligence (AGI) and its feasibility. The tone is supportive and aligns with the critical perspective on AGI presented in the original conversation.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions as it is a reasoned agreement with a critical perspective on AGI. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by referencing a fallacy discussed in a book, which can help educate others on the topic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by agreeing with a critical perspective without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a reasoned debate on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.