In reply to:
Max Kesin
@nlpnyc
·
462d
The statement engages in a discussion about political figures and their conduct during elections, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is somewhat critical and comparative, focusing on the behavior of different political actors.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a term 'henchman' which could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the term 'henchman' could be considered disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical and comparative. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a term 'henchman' which could be seen as a personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech but could be more responsible in its choice of words.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.