Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 141
7/30/2024, 3:40:15 PM
X
In reply to:
rokeetleeger
@rokeetleeger
·
91d
@marwilliamson I disagree. If the solution is 10 years away we need to fix the border yesterday. I agree with you a root caused based approach might be a better method overall, but that doesn’t underscore the fact that we need to stop the bleeding.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
91d
Many of the problems on our Southern border are consequences of our own misguided policies over the last 50 years. Does no good to treat symptoms until we’re willing to look at root cause. 1/6

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about border policies and their underlying causes, contributing to civic dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and aims to contribute constructively to the discussion, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of the root causes, thus aligning with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, thus adhering to the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]