Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 141
7/30/2024, 3:41:36 PM
X
In reply to:
Girl Wonder
@yo_wonderful
·
91d
@marwilliamson So when my kid comes home with fentanyl I'll say "look, you do that while I go down to talk to the governments of central and South America...?"
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
91d
Many of the problems on our Southern border are consequences of our own misguided policies over the last 50 years. Does no good to treat symptoms until we’re willing to look at root cause. 1/6

The statement '@yo_wonderful Maybe you should read my post again' is a direct reply in a conversation about public policy issues related to drug control and border policies. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it is somewhat dismissive and could be seen as condescending. This could be considered a minor violation of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and thus respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more corrective in nature and does not contribute positively to the dialogue.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it also does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is dismissive rather than engaging in a meaningful way.