In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
97d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
97d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of racial identification and its implications in the context of public figures, specifically Kamala Harris. The tone is respectful and aims to promote a more inclusive way of referring to individuals based on their professional achievements rather than their race.
- The statement strives to do no harm by avoiding racial labels and focusing on professional titles, which can be seen as a respectful approach. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of Kamala Harris by referring to her professional roles rather than her race. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by suggesting a more inclusive way of referring to individuals, which can foster a more respectful dialogue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by offering an alternative perspective on how to refer to Kamala Harris without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.