The statement questions the reasons behind OpenAI's decision not to release GPT-5, touching on potential technical, safety, and political issues. It engages with public concerns about the development and deployment of advanced AI technologies, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not cause harm with words or actions. It raises questions without making unfounded accusations or inflammatory remarks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by considering multiple perspectives (technical, safety, political) and invites further discussion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by posing questions rather than making personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing a relevant public issue without spreading misinformation or engaging in harmful rhetoric. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.