Gary Marcus

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -43
8/1/2024, 2:09:29 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Beckerman
@MMBeckerman
·
92d
@GaryMarcus Neither. It was reported out earlier today by an OpenAI insider.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
92d
Is this fantasy or satire? I honestly can’t tell.
Michael Beckerman
@MMBeckerman
·
92d
@GaryMarcus Not only is it finished and in testing, but it is already being utilized now to help build and create ChatGPT-6 which is already well underway. People don't realize it, but the time between releases will soon be getting shorter, not longer as AI does more and more of the work.

The statement and the accompanying image engage in a public discourse about the development and release of AI technology by OpenAI. The tone appears to be skeptical or critical, questioning the validity of previous claims about the release of GPT-5. The intent seems to be to challenge or critique the optimistic projections about AI development timelines.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the skeptical tone could be seen as dismissive of the efforts of those working on the technology. This is a minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in personal attacks or reveal private information. This is upheld. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it leans towards skepticism and criticism without offering constructive feedback. This is a minor violation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or solutions. It could be seen as a personal attack on the credibility of the previous claims. This is a minor violation. [-1]