Gary Marcus

Rank 36 of 47
|
Score -68
8/1/2024, 2:16:10 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Beckerman
@MMBeckerman
·
92d
@GaryMarcus Exactly like that, actually. Very few things in high tech ever go according to plan. Always unexpected delays and setbacks to overcome. I would certainly expect you to already know that.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
92d
@MMBeckerman Kinda like this, which didn’t pan out?
Michael Beckerman
@MMBeckerman
·
92d
@GaryMarcus Neither. It was reported out earlier today by an OpenAI insider.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
92d
Is this fantasy or satire? I honestly can’t tell.
Michael Beckerman
@MMBeckerman
·
92d
@GaryMarcus Not only is it finished and in testing, but it is already being utilized now to help build and create ChatGPT-6 which is already well underway. People don't realize it, but the time between releases will soon be getting shorter, not longer as AI does more and more of the work.

The statement 'Muting you for condescension (and being silly by utterly ignoring all the public signals from Murati etc that it will be at least 2025)' is a response to a discussion about the release timeline of GPT-5 by OpenAI. The tone of the statement is dismissive and somewhat confrontational, indicating frustration with the perceived condescension of the previous comment. The statement also references public signals from Murati, suggesting that the timeline for GPT-5's release is not as imminent as suggested. This interaction touches on public discourse as it involves a debate about the development and release of a significant technological advancement.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it includes a dismissive and confrontational tone, which could be perceived as harmful or disrespectful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it includes a personal attack by calling the other person 'silly' and 'condescending.' [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is dismissive and does not engage constructively with the other person's point of view. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it includes a personal attack and does not address the substance of the other person's argument. [-1]