Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the investment in generative AI (GenAI) and suggests that the funds could be better used for more meritorious causes. It also promotes an alternative approach to AI, namely neuro-symbolic AI, and links to an article for further reading.
- The statement does not use harmful language and is focused on critiquing a technology rather than individuals, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging readers to consider the implications of investment in AI and to explore alternative approaches. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of generative AI and does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By questioning the allocation of investment dollars, the statement uses its influence to advocate for the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.