In reply to:
Haider.
@slow_developer
Β·
280d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
Β·
281d
The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the future of language models, specifically addressing the computational resources and potential enhancements of GPT-5. The reply by @slow_developer also contributes to this discourse by suggesting an alternative approach to improving language models.
- The statement by @slow_developer strives to do no harm and focuses on a constructive suggestion for improving language models, aligning with the principle of doing no harm.Β [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by suggesting a thoughtful approach to a complex issue, which aligns with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion.Β [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a question with a substantive suggestion, avoiding personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, thus adhering to the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue.Β [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.