In reply to:
Stoned Ape
@MachineElvesApe
·
95d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
95d
The statement involves a direct response to a public conversation about AI predictions, which can be considered public discourse as it engages with a public issue. The tone is confrontational and defensive, suggesting a personal dispute rather than a constructive dialogue.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is confrontational and dismissive, which can escalate tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and borders on cyberbullying by using phrases like 'you people always retreat.' [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks and generalizations. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes; it is focused on defending a position.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.