Gary Marcus

Rank 35 of 47
|
Score -20
8/3/2024, 3:42:43 AM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
95d
@tunguz what was I wrong about? (and note that i posted an error correction of a sort about 20 minutes ago). aside from the unexpected ease of Winograd Schemas almost everything i have predicted in last 12 years has been correct or is pending but with good evidence.

have evidence to the…
Bojan Tunguz
@tunguz
·
95d
@GaryMarcus Prediction: you’ll never say you were wrong, just you never did before.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
95d
@tunguz Prediction this tweet will not age well, just like Yann LeCun’s critiques of my critiques of LLMs :)
Bojan Tunguz
@tunguz
·
95d
Prediction: this tweet will not age well. Screenshotting it just in case. For the record.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
95d
I just wrote a great piece for WIRED predicting that the AI bubble will in collapse in 2025, and now I wish I hadn’t.

Clearly, I got the year wrong. It’s going to be days or weeks from now, not months.

The statement by @GaryMarcus ('So you have time to continue to troll me but not support your assertions? Expected better from you tbh.') constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about AI predictions and the credibility of assertions made by public figures in the field. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, which impacts the evaluation of the principles.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it accuses @tunguz of trolling, which can be harmful and inflammatory. (-2 points) [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of @tunguz; it engages in a form of public shaming by calling them a troll. (-2 points) [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and dismissive. (-2 points) [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to a personal attack by labeling @tunguz as a troll. (-2 points) [-2]