Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement by Gary Marcus constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue: the governance and ethical implications of AI startups. The tone is cautionary and critical, aiming to raise awareness about the potential dangers of allowing privately held AI companies to self-regulate.
- The statement strives to do no harm by raising awareness about potential risks, which can be seen as a preventive measure. It does not use harmful language. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the actions and governance of AI startups rather than engaging in personal attacks or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the ethical and transparency issues related to AI governance, encouraging the public to consider these aspects critically. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the self-governance of AI startups. It does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques the broader system. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the influence of the speaker to raise awareness about a significant societal issue, aiming for the betterment of society by advocating for more ethical and transparent governance of AI. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a critical public issue with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.