In reply to:
Matthieu
@DrMatths
·
410d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
410d
The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about the future of AI technology, specifically the potential for a bubble burst in the AI industry. The statement promotes the author's Substack for further understanding and provides credentials to support their argument.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm and is focused on sharing information and predictions about AI technology. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing detailed credentials and past predictions to support the author's viewpoint. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a differing opinion and providing evidence to support the author's stance without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the author's influence to contribute to the public discourse on AI technology, aiming to inform and educate the audience. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.