In reply to:
Schyler Parker ☘️
@Schyler__Parker
·
88d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
88d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the endorsement of political candidates and the principles guiding voting decisions. The tone is respectful and aims to clarify the speaker's stance on endorsements and voting principles.
- The statement strives to do no harm by not endorsing any candidate and respecting voters' ability to make their own decisions. This aligns well with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clearly explaining the principle guiding the speaker's voting decision, which is to prevent Donald Trump from returning to office. This fosters empathy and compassion for those concerned about Trump's potential return. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the question posed without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It maintains a respectful tone throughout. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing a thoughtful response to a public concern without endorsing any candidate, thus maintaining integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.