In reply to:
Storm14Echo (not a bot)
@Storm14Echo
·
88d
The Spectator Index
@spectatorindex
·
89d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a discussion about persecution and historical grievances, which are significant societal issues.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm, but it could be interpreted as dismissive of historical suffering, which might indirectly cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not show respect for the dignity of those who have suffered persecution. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is dismissive and does not contribute to a constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not offer constructive criticism or dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.