Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by addressing the expectations and realities surrounding AI development, specifically the limitations of large language models (LLMs) and the notion of artificial general intelligence (AGI). The tone is analytical and somewhat critical, aiming to temper public expectations about the capabilities of current AI technologies.
- The statement strives to do no harm by providing a realistic perspective on AI capabilities, which can prevent misinformation and unrealistic expectations. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the distinction between LLMs and AGI, contributing to a more informed public dialogue. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the hype around AI without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to better inform society about the realistic capabilities of AI, which can lead to more grounded discussions and decisions regarding AI technology. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.