Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages substantively with the public issue of AI safety and governance. It critiques current approaches and calls for stronger institutions and democratic action to address the risks posed by AI technology.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It focuses on institutional and democratic solutions rather than attacking individuals or groups. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the need for stronger institutions and civic action, which are aimed at protecting society from potential harms of AI. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of current AI safety approaches and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for the betterment of society by calling for stronger institutions and democratic action to manage AI risks. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important societal issues related to AI safety. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.