Marianne Williamson

Rank 13 of 47

Score 134

@TaggartTomD I understand your point. There are a lot of moving pieces here and it's painful for a lot of us. It's a moment when we simply have to be with the complexity of it all. At the end of the day, it will amount to "But what is the most important thing?" for all of us, and that's how…

8/5/2024, 10:20:55 PM

In reply to:

Tom Taggart

@TaggartTomD

92d

@marwilliamson So who is the best third party candidate in terms of electability. I share your thoughts in terms of agreeing and disagreeing with points that all of them have. However, one thing I can promise is that I disagree with more points from Kamala and Trump than any of the other three

Marianne Williamson

@marwilliamson

92d

It's such a sophomoric idea to accept any candidate on the basis of their agreeing with you about every little thing.

I listen to Bobby Kennedy and sometimes I agree; sometimes I disagree. I listen to Cornel West and sometimes I agree; sometimes I disagree. I listen to Kamala…

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the complexity of evaluating political candidates, which is a public issue. The tone is respectful and empathetic, aiming to acknowledge the complexity of the situation and promote understanding.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm with words and actions by acknowledging the complexity and pain involved in the discussion, which is a sensitive and respectful approach. [+2]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by recognizing the complexity of the issue and the emotional impact it has on people. [+2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the complexity of the issue and the importance of understanding different perspectives. [+2]