In reply to:
Ann Menasche
@AnnMenasche
·
319d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
319d
The statement by @AnnMenasche and the subsequent reply by @marwilliamson engage in a discussion about the substantive content of political candidates' platforms, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is relatively neutral and aims to direct attention to a specific resource for further information.
- The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone, focusing on providing information. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by directing users to a resource where they can learn more about the candidate's platform. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a resource for further information rather than attacking the other candidate or the person asking the question. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to inform the public about a candidate's platform, contributing to the betterment of society by promoting informed decision-making. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing a link to substantive content. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.