Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
8/7/2024, 2:34:59 AM
X
In reply to:
Tom
@TomTomClub510
·
527d
@GaryMarcus Didn’t one of the founders just take a sabbatical? That is, as they say, a tell.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
527d
Most of this still feels right—two weeks later—but I sure did leave one important question out: does the company look stable?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
540d
SCOOP: OpenAI may lose $5B this year & may run out of cash in 12 months, unless they raise more $, per analysis @theinformation.

Investors should ask: What is their moat? Unique tech? What is their route in profitability when Meta is giving away similar tech for free? Do they…

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the stability and financial health of OpenAI, a significant player in the tech industry. The tone is analytical and somewhat critical, focusing on the departure of employees and the potential financial instability of the company.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but highlights potential issues within OpenAI, which could be seen as a form of constructive criticism. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals by not naming specific employees or making personal attacks. It focuses on the broader issue of employee turnover and company stability. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing specific numbers and context about employee departures and financial concerns, which can help the public understand the challenges faced by OpenAI. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the stability of OpenAI and providing data to support the concerns. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]