Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
8/7/2024, 2:35:46 AM
X
In reply to:
AGIHound
@TrueAIHound
·
527d
@GaryMarcus Good question. I predicted a few months ago that OpenAI would either fold or become part of Microsoft before the end of the year. I still stand by that prediction.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
527d
Most of this still feels right—two weeks later—but I sure did leave one important question out: does the company look stable?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
540d
SCOOP: OpenAI may lose $5B this year & may run out of cash in 12 months, unless they raise more $, per analysis @theinformation.

Investors should ask: What is their moat? Unique tech? What is their route in profitability when Meta is giving away similar tech for free? Do they…

The statement 'I don’t think it will play either of those two ways but I am less sure than before.' is part of a broader discussion about the financial stability and future of OpenAI. The conversation involves predictions and analysis of OpenAI's financial situation, which is a matter of public interest and concern. The tone of the statement is speculative and reflects uncertainty, which is appropriate given the context of financial predictions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is a respectful contribution to the discussion, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by expressing a personal viewpoint and acknowledging uncertainty, which can foster a more nuanced discussion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, adhering to the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]