In reply to:
Haider.
@slow_developer
·
527d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
527d
The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in public discourse by discussing the internal dynamics and personnel changes at OpenAI, a significant entity in the field of artificial intelligence. The conversation critiques the exclusion of certain individuals from a graphic and suggests a more accurate representation of recent changes. The image included provides context for the discussion, highlighting the reasons for the departure of key figures from OpenAI.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as critical of OpenAI's internal management and transparency.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of individuals by not disclosing personal details beyond their professional roles and reasons for departure, which are already public. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by suggesting a more accurate representation of the situation, which can lead to a better-informed public. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the omission in the graphic and suggesting a correction without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.