Gary Marcus

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning the internal dynamics and potential challenges within OpenAI. The tone is apologetic and aims to clarify a previous comment that may have been perceived as harsh. The intent is to acknowledge the quality of the graphic while suggesting it could be more complete, and to apologize for any unintended offense.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement strives to do no harm by apologizing for any perceived harshness and clarifying the intent behind the previous comment. This aligns well with the principle. [+2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a respectful tone throughout. [+2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the potential miscommunication and expressing appreciation for the graphic's quality. [+2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by suggesting an improvement to the graphic without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement acknowledges and corrects a mistake by apologizing for any unintended offense and clarifying the intent behind the previous comment. [+2]