The statement argues for the inclusion of the Holocaust, slavery, and Jim Crow in educational curricula, emphasizing the importance of understanding historical human rights abuses. The tone is assertive and the intent is to advocate for comprehensive historical education.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for education on human rights abuses, which can foster a more informed and empathetic society. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by highlighting the importance of learning about significant historical injustices. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by supporting Tim Walz's argument and expanding it to include other historical contexts without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence for the betterment of society by advocating for a more inclusive and comprehensive educational curriculum. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to advocate for educational reform. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.