In reply to:
Glenn Little
@GlennLittle5
·
359d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
359d
The statement by @GlennLittle5 constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about historical education and the importance of learning about various atrocities. The tone is generally informative and seeks to contribute to the dialogue about educational content in history.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a neutral comment about learning history. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by discussing the importance of learning about history, although it could be more explicit in promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss an important educational issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.